Upon superficial examination, what
unites these two attitudes is a heavy emphasis upon subjective and interior states of mind and an
assumption that truth cannot be found in dry, analytical, or objective facts
but in the examination of the human condition. Beyond these core similarities,
it would appear that these approaches to life are completely dissimilar.
However, from an astrological standpoint, we can treat these differing positions
as being particular stances to the Saturn-Neptune dilemma.
Romanticism flourished on both sides of the Atlantic in the nineteenth century partially in reaction to the rise of science
and the Enlightenment but also as stance and attitude in its own right.
Characterized by heightened sensitivity to inspiration, the ineffable, and
emotion, Romanticism was both a lifestyle and an approach to life as it was a
definitive movement in the arts and history of thought. For the Romantic, the soul’s condition was
valued over and above the growing reliance upon objective certainty,
contemplation on transcendent meaning took precedence over pragmatic knowledge,
and the translation of one’s feeling response into inspired thought and art was
the greatest possible achievement.
We can see in Romanticism one way of expressing and
managing the eternal dilemma of the Saturn-Neptune equation. As a core
principle, the Saturn-Neptune gestalt makes the divide between some
transcendent other and the mundane and commonplace that which needs to be
attended to in a serious and significant fashion. The Romantic reaction to this
predicament is to attempt to express and harness this divide and all of its
concomitant challenges through some form of heightened, sublimated awareness, action
or achievement: poetic melancholy, exquisitely sentimental music, serious meditation on the profundity of meaning in life,
inspired and revelatory expression of the divine.
|